Yesterday I listened to a podcast episode that talked a lot about masculine/feminine energy, and how it can be problematic to use those terms because we have so much baggage attached to them thanks to patriarchy. Things like yin/yang, solar/lunar, etc were proposed, but I kept thinking “but wait, WHAT ENERGY ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
Because pretty much everything they were assigning to either box was either also present in the other one or actively contradicted something already in the box!
Here, I’ll try to show what I mean.
- Being (rather than doing)
- Doing (rather than being)
So these seem pretty straightforward, right?
Receptive-but-not-passive as an opposite to active doesn’t really work.
I think farmers would be startled to hear the sun is destructive.
Last time I checked, men and women both do shit and are things.
Another example: feminine energy was described as nurturing.
Until pretty recently, a lot of nurturing roles in society were held by men – they were powerful roles, so men had them instead of women. Farming, teaching, animal husbandry, etc. were manly things to do. Now they’re not.
Also: isn’t nurturing active? Doesn’t it require output? You don’t nurture by receiving or being. You nurture by doing. ARGH.
This all just slides back into my frustration that you can’t really assign anything to masculine/feminine without some pretty major contradictions.
Furthermore, insisting on a binary all the damn time is pretty narrow-minded.
Like, presumably the opposite of nurturing is destroying… or maybe it’s ignoring something and letting it die?
Receptive and active aren’t necessarily opposites – what about a great big snake swallowing something? That’s receptive in that the snake is receiving the thing it’s eating, but I suspect the prey wouldn’t consider it inactive.
If “being” and “doing” are opposites, what do we call mindfulness? You can walk mindfully and be both fully present (being) and in motion (doing).
As the podcast went on, it got harder and harder to pay attention because my mind kept running off on tangents.
I seriously could not come up with a single trait/characteristic/descriptor that was exclusive male or female. Most of the standard ones offered by society are patriarchal bullshit and easily dismissible, but so are a lot of the ones offered by alternative lifestyle folks. Between confirmation bias and unconscious sexism, it’s almost impossible for us to really shed our binary-gender lenses, I know, but still.
Of course, ultimately society’s expectations have huge impact on us, and there’s something to be said for the argument that yes, gender is made up and a societal construct but it still impacts people so we should quit bitching about it. I know a trans person who transitioned in part (as they explained it to me, anyway) so that other people would react to her in a way that felt appropriate.
I’m woo-woo enough to admit that folks who identify as masculine and folks who identify as feminine have different vibes to them. I can’t figure out which vibe I give off, though, and I sure as shit can’t figure out what I am using the bullshit boxes society offers.
Clearly I’m having a GENDER IS STUPID CAN WE JUST STOP PLEASE UGHHHH day. Time to go pet the cats and get back to focusing on my dayjob.